Workload Placement

Convox provides powerful tools to control where your applications and build processes run within your Kubernetes cluster. By leveraging node group configurations and service placement rules, you can optimize resource usage, improve cost efficiency, and ensure the right workloads run on the right infrastructure.

Workload Placement is available on AWS and Azure racks.

Reach for workload placement when the default single node group is no longer the right fit: when you want to run builds on separate hardware from production services, use cheaper spot instances for non-critical work, match instance types to specific workload profiles, isolate sensitive services on dedicated nodes, or mix CPU architectures within one rack. If your apps run fine on the rack's standard nodes, you do not need any of this.

This page is organized so you can decide first, configure second. The strategies and configuration components below explain the moving parts and the field options. The JSON examples and implementation walkthroughs that follow give you copy-ready configurations once you know what you want.

Workload Placement Strategies

Workload placement in Convox is achieved through these key features:

  1. Custom Node Groups: Define specialized node pools with specific instance types, scaling parameters, labels, and tags.
  2. Node Selectors: Direct specific services or build processes to appropriate node groups.
  3. Dedicated Node Pools: Isolate workloads by creating exclusive node groups for particular services.

These capabilities allow for sophisticated infrastructure optimization strategies, such as:

  • Separating production services from build processes
  • Using cost-effective spot instances for non-critical workloads
  • Optimizing instance types for specific workload profiles
  • Creating high-performance node groups for specialized services
  • Tracking resource usage and costs with provider tags

Configuration Components

Rack-level Configuration

At the rack level, you can define custom node groups using provider-specific rack parameters:

AWS:

Azure:

These parameters allow you to specify:

  • Instance types (EC2 instance types on AWS, VM sizes on Azure)
  • Disk sizes
  • Capacity types (on-demand vs. spot)
  • Scaling parameters
  • Custom labels for workload targeting
  • Unique IDs for node group preservation across updates
  • Provider tags for cost allocation and resource organization

These configurations are independent of each other. You can use either one or both depending on your needs. If you only configure additional node groups, builds will continue using the rack's primary build node (if build_node_enabled is set on AWS) or the primary rack nodes. If you only configure build node groups, your services will continue running on the standard rack nodes while builds will be isolated according to your build configuration.

Node Group Configuration Options

Each node group configuration supports the following fields:

Field Required Description Default
id No Unique integer identifier for the node group Auto-generated
type Yes The instance type to use (AWS EC2 type or Azure VM size)
disk No The disk size in GB for the nodes Same as main node disk
capacity_type No Whether to use on-demand or spot instances ON_DEMAND
min_size No Minimum number of nodes 1
max_size No Maximum number of nodes 100
label No Custom label value for the node group. Applied as convox.io/label: <label-value> None
tags No Custom provider tags as comma-separated key-value pairs None
dedicated No When true, only services with matching node group labels will be scheduled on these nodes false
ami_id No Custom AMI ID to use (AWS only) EKS-optimized AMI
zones No Comma-separated list of availability zones (Azure only) None

About the id field

The id field provides important benefits:

  • Preserves node group identity during configuration updates
  • Prevents unnecessary recreation of node groups
  • Allows for stable references when targeting specific node groups
  • Reduces downtime during configuration changes

Without the id field, Convox generates a random identifier that changes when the configuration is updated, potentially causing unnecessary node group recreation.

Setting Rack Parameters with JSON Files

While you can set configuration directly using a JSON string, most users find it more manageable to use a JSON file, especially for complex configurations.

Using a JSON File for Node Groups

Create a JSON file (e.g., node-groups.json) with your configuration. The type field uses EC2 instance types on AWS and VM sizes on Azure.

AWS example:

[
  {
    "id": 101,
    "type": "t3.medium",
    "capacity_type": "ON_DEMAND",
    "min_size": 1,
    "max_size": 5,
    "label": "critical-services",
    "tags": "environment=production,team=frontend"
  },
  {
    "id": 102,
    "type": "c5.large",
    "capacity_type": "SPOT",
    "min_size": 0,
    "max_size": 10,
    "label": "batch-workers",
    "disk": 100,
    "tags": "environment=production,team=data,workload=batch"
  }
]

Azure example:

[
  {
    "id": 101,
    "type": "Standard_D4s_v3",
    "capacity_type": "ON_DEMAND",
    "min_size": 1,
    "max_size": 5,
    "label": "critical-services",
    "tags": "environment=production,team=frontend"
  },
  {
    "id": 102,
    "type": "Standard_E4s_v3",
    "capacity_type": "SPOT",
    "min_size": 0,
    "max_size": 10,
    "label": "batch-workers",
    "disk": 100,
    "tags": "environment=production,team=data,workload=batch"
  }
]

Note the use of:

  • The id field to uniquely identify each node group
  • The tags field to apply provider resource tags for organization and cost tracking

Then apply the configuration using:

$ convox rack params set additional_node_groups_config=/path/to/node-groups.json -r rackName

Important Note on AWS Rate Limits: On AWS, when adding or removing multiple node groups, modify no more than three node groups at a time to avoid hitting AWS API rate limits. If you receive a rate limit error during an update, run the parameter set command again. The operation will resume from where it left off, creating the remaining node groups without duplicating the ones that were already successfully created.

Using a JSON File for Build Node Groups

Similarly, create a JSON file (e.g., build-groups.json) for build node configuration:

AWS example:

[
  {
    "id": 201,
    "type": "c5.xlarge",
    "capacity_type": "SPOT",
    "min_size": 0,
    "max_size": 3,
    "label": "app-build",
    "disk": 100,
    "tags": "environment=build,team=devops"
  }
]

Azure example:

[
  {
    "id": 201,
    "type": "Standard_D8s_v3",
    "capacity_type": "SPOT",
    "min_size": 0,
    "max_size": 3,
    "label": "app-build",
    "disk": 100,
    "tags": "environment=build,team=devops"
  }
]

Apply it with:

$ convox rack params set additional_build_groups_config=/path/to/build-groups.json -r rackName

Using a Single JSON String (Alternative Approach)

If you prefer to set configuration directly in the command line without creating a file, you can use a JSON string:

$ convox rack params set 'additional_node_groups_config=[{"id":101,"type":"t3.medium","capacity_type":"ON_DEMAND","min_size":1,"max_size":5,"label":"critical-services","tags":"environment=production,team=frontend"}]' -r rackName
$ convox rack params set 'additional_build_groups_config=[{"id":201,"type":"c5.xlarge","capacity_type":"SPOT","min_size":0,"max_size":3,"label":"app-build","disk":100,"tags":"environment=build,team=devops"}]' -r rackName

This approach is useful for automation scripts or when making quick changes, though it becomes unwieldy for more complex configurations.

App-level Configuration

At the application level, you can control where specific workloads run:

  • BuildArch: Directs build pods to build nodes matching a specific CPU architecture (amd64 or arm64)
  • BuildLabels: Directs build pods to specific node groups
  • BuildCpu and BuildMem: Sets resource requests for build pods
  • nodeSelectorLabels in convox.yml: Directs service pods to specific node groups

Service-level Configuration

In your convox.yml file, you can specify node selectors for each service:

services:
  web:
    nodeSelectorLabels:
      convox.io/label: app-workers
  worker:
    nodeSelectorLabels:
      convox.io/label: batch-workers

You can also specify nodeAffinityLabels with weights to specify preferences of where to place services. The node.kubernetes.io/instance-type label uses EC2 instance types on AWS or Azure VM sizes on Azure:

AWS example:

services:
  web:
    nodeAffinityLabels:
      - weight: 1
        label: node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
        value: t3a.medium
      - weight: 10
        label: node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
        value: t3a.large

Azure example:

services:
  web:
    nodeAffinityLabels:
      - weight: 1
        label: node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
        value: Standard_D2s_v3
      - weight: 10
        label: node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
        value: Standard_D4s_v3

Weights will be summed for all matching labels and the node with the highest weight will have the service scheduled on it.

You can combine the two options as well:

services:
  web:
    nodeSelectorLabels:
      convox.io/label: app-workers
    nodeAffinityLabels:
      - weight: 1
        label: node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
        value: t3a.medium
      - weight: 10
        label: node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
        value: t3a.large

In this case, the service will definitely be scheduled on the app-workers group, preferably on a t3a.large instance, or if not on a t3a.medium instance, or if not, then any other instance in the group. Use the equivalent Azure VM sizes when running on Azure racks.

Implementation Examples

For copy-ready, end-to-end walkthroughs, see Workload Placement Examples. It covers optimizing for cost and performance, isolating high-priority workloads, mixed ARM/x86 architecture, and flexible configuration options.

Best Practices

  1. CPU Architecture (Single or Mixed):

    • A rack's primary nodes define the default architecture. Additional node groups can use a different architecture to create a mixed ARM/x86 rack.
    • On AWS, Graviton instances (e.g. t4g, c7g, m7g) are ARM. Standard instances (e.g. t3, c5, m5) are x86. You can mix architectures by adding additional node groups and build groups with different instance families. See node_type for the full list of supported instance families.
    • On Azure, only x86-based VM SKUs are currently supported. ARM-based VM SKUs are not available. See node_type for details.
    • Mixed architecture requires BuildArch: When running mixed-architecture node groups, use the BuildArch app parameter to direct each app's builds to build nodes matching its target architecture. Without BuildArch, builds run on any available build node and may produce binaries for the wrong architecture.
    • Convox system images are multi-arch: System components (including Fluentd) are published as multi-arch Docker manifests and run natively on both x86 and ARM nodes with no configuration.
  2. Match Node Resources to Workload Requirements:

    • On AWS: use compute-optimized instances (c5, c6i) for CPU-intensive workloads, memory-optimized (r5, r6i) for memory-intensive workloads, and general-purpose (m5, t3) for balanced workloads
    • On Azure: use compute-optimized VMs (Standard_F series) for CPU-intensive workloads, memory-optimized (Standard_E series) for memory-intensive workloads, and general-purpose (Standard_D series) for balanced workloads
  3. Cost Optimization:

    • Use spot instances for interruptible workloads like batch processing
    • Use on-demand instances for critical production services
    • Set appropriate min/max scaling parameters to avoid over-provisioning
    • Apply tags to track costs by team, environment, or application
  4. Build Process Optimization:

    • Configure build nodes with higher CPU and memory for faster builds
    • Use spot instances for builds to reduce costs
    • Set min_size: 0 to allow build nodes to scale down when not in use
  5. Service Isolation:

    • Use the dedicated flag for node groups that need strict isolation
    • Separate services with conflicting resource profiles into different node groups
  6. Node Group Identity Management:

    • Always assign a unique id to each node group
    • Use consistent, meaningful IDs (e.g., 100-199 for production, 200-299 for builds)
    • Document your ID allocation to avoid conflicts
  7. Tagging Strategy:

    • Develop a consistent tagging convention for all node groups
    • Include tags for environment, team, cost center, and workload type
    • Align tags with your organization's cloud provider tagging policy

Troubleshooting

Build Failures Due to Node Selection

If builds fail with scheduling errors, verify:

  • The build node group exists and has the correct labels
  • The BuildLabels parameter matches the node group's labels
  • There are nodes available that match the label criteria

Service Deployment Issues

If services won't deploy, check:

  • Node selector labels in convox.yml match existing node groups
  • The referenced node groups have available capacity
  • Resource requests in the service definition can be satisfied by the node group

Node Group Scaling

If nodes aren't scaling as expected:

  • Verify min/max settings are appropriate
  • Check that instance types or VM sizes are available in your region
  • Monitor for cloud provider service quotas that might limit scaling

Node Group Preservation Issues

If node groups are being recreated unexpectedly:

  • Ensure each node group has a unique id field
  • Verify that you're not changing immutable fields (like capacity type)
  • On AWS, check for API rate limits during updates

Summary

Effective workload placement is a powerful tool for optimizing your Convox infrastructure. By leveraging custom node groups with preserved identities, service placement rules, and provider tagging, you can create an infrastructure that balances performance, cost, and isolation requirements for your specific application needs.

For more detailed information, refer to the provider-specific rack parameter pages:

AWS:

Azure:

App Parameters:

Node Autoscaling:

  • Karpenter for pod-level node provisioning with cost optimization and scale-to-zero builds (AWS only)